In an era dominated by voice assistants, augmented reality interfaces, and AI-driven content discovery, one might assume that outdated web practices from the early 2000s have long been relegated to digital history books. Yet, a recent report from the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) highlights a surprising persistence: the ubiquitous “click here” hyperlink text remains prevalent across millions of websites, posing ongoing challenges for accessibility, user experience, and search engine optimization.
The study, released last week by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), analyzed over 10,000 popular websites and found that nearly 40% still employ generic link phrases like “click here” or “read more.” This figure, while down from 60% a decade ago, underscores a slow evolution in web design standards. As we delve into this phenomenon, experts argue that understanding its roots and implications is crucial for building a more inclusive internet.
A Brief History of Hyperlink Text
The phrase “click here” traces its origins back to the dawn of the World Wide Web in the 1990s. When Tim Berners-Lee invented the hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP), hyperlinks were a revolutionary way to connect information. Early web pages, often created by non-designers, used straightforward instructions to guide users. “Click here” became a default because it was simple and direct, assuming users were navigating with a mouse.
As the internet grew, so did the diversity of users and devices. By the early 2000s, screen readers for visually impaired individuals highlighted the flaws in such generic text. These tools read links out of context, making “click here” meaningless without surrounding content. Accessibility guidelines, such as the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), began advocating for descriptive link text that conveys purpose, like “Download the report” instead of “Click here to download.”
Despite these recommendations, inertia in web development persisted. Legacy systems, content management templates, and a lack of awareness among creators kept the phrase alive. In 2010, usability expert Jakob Nielsen famously criticized “click here” as “user-hostile,” arguing it forces users to scan extra text to understand the link’s destination.
Current Statistics and Trends
Fast-forward to 2025, and the W3C’s latest audit reveals mixed progress. High-traffic sites like e-commerce platforms and news outlets have largely adopted better practices, with only 15% using generic links. However, smaller blogs, educational resources, and government websites lag behind, with rates exceeding 50% in some sectors.
One contributing factor is the rise of no-code tools and AI-generated content. Platforms like WordPress and AI writing assistants often default to simplistic link structures unless customized. A survey by UX Collective, involving 500 web designers, found that 30% admitted to using “click here” out of habit or time constraints.
Moreover, the shift to mobile and touch-based interfaces has amplified the issue. On smartphones, “clicking” isn’t literal; users tap. Voice commands via assistants like Siri or Grok further complicate matters, as ambiguous links can lead to frustrating experiences. “The web is no longer just visual,” says Dr. Elena Vasquez, a digital accessibility researcher at Stanford University. “Generic phrases like ‘click here’ alienate users who rely on alternative inputs.”
Impact on Accessibility and Inclusion
The accessibility implications are profound. According to the World Health Organization, over 1 billion people live with some form of disability, many of whom use assistive technologies. For screen reader users, navigating a page littered with “click here” links is akin to wandering a library with unlabeled bookshelves.
A case study from the American Foundation for the Blind illustrates this: In testing 100 e-government sites, participants using screen readers took 40% longer to complete tasks on pages with generic links. This not only frustrates users but also raises legal concerns. In the United States, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) has led to lawsuits against companies whose websites fail accessibility standards, with “click here” often cited as a violation.
Beyond accessibility, there’s a business angle. Search engines like Google penalize poor user experience, including non-descriptive links. SEO experts note that descriptive anchors improve crawlability and click-through rates. “If your link says ‘click here,’ you’re missing an opportunity to include relevant keywords naturally,” explains Mia Chen, an SEO consultant based in New York.
For more insights on enhancing your digital strategy, click here.
Expert Opinions and Case Studies
To gain deeper perspective, we spoke with several industry leaders. Sarah Thompson, lead UX designer at a major tech firm, shared her team’s transition away from generic links. “We audited our entire site in 2023 and replaced over 5,000 instances of ‘click here.’ The result? A 15% increase in user engagement and fewer support tickets related to navigation confusion.”
Another compelling example comes from the BBC, which revamped its website in 2024 to prioritize accessibility. By adopting descriptive links like “Listen to the podcast episode,” the broadcaster reported a 20% uptick in content consumption among disabled users. “It’s about empathy,” says BBC’s digital director, Mark Harrington. “We want everyone to access information seamlessly.”
Conversely, challenges persist in resource-strapped environments. Non-profits and small businesses often lack the expertise or tools to update legacy content. Initiatives like the Accessibility Project offer free resources, but adoption remains uneven.
Alternatives and Best Practices
So, what should replace “click here”? Experts recommend link text that stands alone, describing the destination or action. Examples include:
- “View the full infographic on climate change”
- “Register for the webinar on AI ethics”
- “Download our free e-book on sustainable living”
Tools like automated accessibility checkers, such as WAVE or Axe, can flag generic links during development. Integrating these into CI/CD pipelines ensures compliance from the start.
Education plays a key role too. Online courses on platforms like Coursera and Udemy now include modules on inclusive design, emphasizing the pitfalls of outdated phrases.
For additional resources on building a stronger online presence, click here.
Looking ahead, emerging technologies may render “click here” obsolete. With the advent of neural interfaces and gesture-based browsing, interaction paradigms are evolving. AI-powered personalization could dynamically generate descriptive links based on user context.
However, until these become mainstream, the onus is on creators to prioritize best practices. The W3C’s report calls for renewed focus, urging web standards bodies to enforce stricter guidelines in upcoming HTML specifications.
In a world where digital equity is increasingly recognized as a human right, phasing out “click here” is more than a design tweak—it’s a step toward a truly inclusive web. As Dr. Vasquez puts it, “Every link is an invitation; make it clear and welcoming.”
This development serves as a reminder that even in 2025, the fundamentals of web design demand vigilance. While progress is evident, the journey toward universal accessibility continues.
